This Page

has been moved to new address

Gillibrand softens up this critic

Sorry for inconvenience...

Redirection provided by Blogger to WordPress Migration Service
Left of the Hudson: Gillibrand softens up this critic

Monday, April 27, 2009

Gillibrand softens up this critic

My diary that appeared on LotH a little over month ago echoed the frustration that many New York progressives have about Governor Paterson's pick to replace Hillary Clinton as our junior Senator.

However, a string of events led me to attend the very fundraiser that I once objected to. And yesterday, I met Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand.

And hell froze over.

I thought my email and diary about this fundraiser would reach perhaps 100-200 people. I was not prepared for the 800-plus email responses that I got from places as diverse as Wyoming County, Scenetady, Rochester, and Watertown. I guess I hit a nerve.

At the core of my grievance was the impression that Gillibrand's fundraiser was marketed as a town-hall style Q&A. As I'm a fervent believer in the public's free and unfettered access to politicians (especially to a newly appointed Senator) I did not find this acceptable. I am told now that the event was always meant to be advertised as a fundraiser and a young, wet-behind-the-ears local politician was credited with incorrectly ballyhooing it in an email to his constituents.

Gillibrand eventually righted this misperception by holding several public events on this same day, including greeting people in the heat at the Nyack Street Fair. Along with the unveiling of the "Sunshine Report" on her Senate Web site, I think she took two big progressive steps.

Rosina Rubin, the host of the event--who eventually held it at her beautiful home--gets a lot of credit for mending fences. She invited me to be her guest at the fundraiser. After debating with myself over whether I would be viewed as a hypocrite, I sheepishly accepted. I prevailed upon myself to have an open mind when I attended.

Gillibrand met a nice-sized group, took several questions from a moderator, and then took questions from the audience. The first thing you'll notice about Sen. Gillibrand is that she talks real fast even while thinking on her feet. After you get used to her oratorical overdrive, you start to appreciate the amount of information she can exchange in a short period of time.

While she talks fast, Gillibrand isn't prone to sales pitches when discussing politics; she's measured, analytical, and concise. There's also no straw-man arguments, no dogma, nor stroking the audience; she's a policy wonk if there ever was one.

I listened to her speak to several concerned members of the audience on gun control and she allayed many concerns and was especially adamant about closing the "gun-show loophole." In fact, Gillibrand systematically addressed every one of my concerns, and she dismissed rumors about herself circulated by some news outlets, such as the one about sleeping with two rifles under her bed.

Beyond that, Gillibrand impressed me with her dedication to repealing the Alternative Minimum Tax and the unfunded No Child Left Behind.

Gillibrand also discussed, in length, criticism of the Food Safety Modernization Act. She assured us that she would not be interested in voting for the bill if it contained requirements that would hurt small and organic farms. Sen. Gillibrand says that she hasn't found anything in the bill, so far, that point in that direction. And, I must say, she seems to be really on top of agricultural issues.

I had my own question about some contradictory evidence concerning the feasibility of cellulosic ethanol, but decided that it was too technical and esoteric to discuss in front of a group. I informed Senator Gillibrand, who met me before I left, that I'd send her my question by email. She seems truly interested in discussing the topic and I'm pretty sure that she'll respond.

All in all, I am much less worried about Sen. Gillibrand than I was a month ago. And credit goes to those on The Albany Project who kept repeating that she is an impressive individual. She certainly does not deserve the derisive label "Tracy Flick" that some of her more nasty critics have tagged her with. (I detested that name calling when I first read it on Politico.)

We've got a little more than a year to the State Democratic Primary and that's plenty of time for Democrats to get to know Sen. Gillibrand. I'm not jumping into her corner just yet, nor am I saying we should forgo a primary, but I do hope to continue to be impressed.

Labels: , , , ,

3 Comments:

Blogger fif said...

I live in Sen. Gillibrand's former district, and she enjoys a 75% approval rating here due to her intelligence, accessibility, dedication, and sincerity. She has been unfairly characterized by the downstate media, and her positions on guns and immigration have been grossly distorted. She is strong, insightful, and genuine. She is also working tirelessly to introduce herself to all of NY, and listening carefully to her new constituents' needs and concerns. Give her time, and she will continue to impress.

April 27, 2009 9:26 PM  
Blogger Amerigus said...

I can add that I was pleasantly surprised by Sen. Gillibrand about two weeks ago when I learned of her commitment towards transparency. Every business day after 6pm, she posts her daily Senatorial schedule at http://gillibrand.senate.gov/newsroom/schedule/

I have to give Sen. Gillibrand credit and I'm as cynical as they come. Her move to reveal who she met with and why for all the public to see, is an immensely commendable move in the right direction that all US Senators must follow.

The ramifications of this are significant - will lobbies and SIGs try to secure official face time under this new scrutiny? Will they be Googled instantly by curious, patriotic, awakened, activist citizen journalists everywhere? Investors may track corporate meetings with the Senator to predict stock fluctuations. Reporters will call for details, you get the picture.

In short, Killibrand demonstrates a voluntary modicum of transparency that Schumer should be called on, as well as every other US Senator.

Senator Jon Tester of Montana claims he became "the first U.S. Senator to post his daily schedule online in 2007". But KG did it before him, as the first member of the House of Representatives to do so. Could it be Tester tried to steal her transparency idea?? Whichever it was, the people win.

April 28, 2009 2:12 PM  
Blogger Omnipotent Oom said...

Gus, I'm a believer in transparency as well. I would like to see Sen. Schumer do this as well and then possibly the entire New York Democratic Congressional Caucus may follow suit.

May 1, 2009 5:31 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home