tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-318451546343557331.post5306383650177248881..comments2009-09-28T22:45:36.924-04:00Comments on Left of the Hudson: Did Christopher St. Lawrence's campaign use grassr...AmeriGushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10654378652446538035noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-318451546343557331.post-46304103125800257532009-09-28T22:45:36.924-04:002009-09-28T22:45:36.924-04:00The problem of the mailer is worse than an anonymo...The problem of the mailer is worse than an anonymous lie. People are already wary of the unsigned slander. This used the name of a local organization to try and get some credibility. In so doing, Concerned Citizens became the innocent bystander of this drive-by.polanvehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17567533872712786768noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-318451546343557331.post-22281294691825216302009-09-15T21:24:33.352-04:002009-09-15T21:24:33.352-04:00Are there no laws governing source disclosure in l...Are there no laws governing source disclosure in local elections? We are all familiar with the "Paid for by ..." tags in larger races, but this mailer was either sent out by St. Lawrence himself, or a "538" group - essentially a Swift Boat-style attack. <br /><br />Left or right, can we not all agree that proper sourcing on all local campaign literature should be enforced? Amerigushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15248564844480188785noreply@blogger.com